Showing posts with label Autobiography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Autobiography. Show all posts

Friday, November 18, 2011

A Father's Instruction

One aspect of the Autobiography that I really appreciated was the way Franklin approached fatherly instruction. He doesn't bluntly say this is bad and that is good and you shouldn't do this because of x, y, and z; rather, he presents his own mistakes in life (which he aptly calls Erratum) and shows what he learned from them, in order to prevent his son (and the other readers he anticipated) from making the same ones. This is a very human and understandable and particularly unpretentious method of instruction. As a son, and one day (not too soon hopefully) a father, I admire his honesty and modesty in relating these Erratum to his son. One instance of Franklin's fatherly instruction deals with a topic men inevitably have to approach (usually with some trepidation) with their sons: relations with the opposite sex. The ensuing "talk" typically involves bad metaphors and trite phrases; however Franklin spends but one concise paragraph discussing the face-reddening topic.


"That hard-to-be-govern'd passion of youth, had hurried me frequently into Intrigues with low Women [..] which were attended with some Expence and great inconvenience, besides a continual Risque to my Health by a Distemper which of all Things I dreaded, tho' by great good Luck I escaped it" (128).


Franklin doesn't lecture about the possibility of contracting deadly diseases through sex, but rather mentions his luck escaping contracting them. He calls his sexual exploits "intrigues with low women," both recognizing the situation's appeal and potential for disgrace and disease. Franklin also considers (yet doesn't exactly explicate why or how) the entire act to be a waste of time and money - not to mention a health risk! By describing how he struggles against "that hard-to-be-govern'd passion of youth," he humanizes lust and passion - simultaneously criticizing the act and pardoning the actor. He also approaches the whole topic from a pragmatist's standpoint, again demonstrating the balance of principle and inclination. This first-hand anecdote shows that he understands life is full of these difficult considerations, and the way to wade through them is to keep a level head and maintain a thought process that thoroughly examines grey situations.

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Quakers at War

There was an interesting juxtaposition in Franklin’s autobiography between Quaker-dominated Pennsylvania and the war going on in the colonies, and I thought Franklin’s portrayal of the Quakers in this context was fascinating. Although he was clearly respectful of their pacifist beliefs (he made sure the Quakers were exempted from military service when he was organizing the colony’s militia), he takes several opportunities in his autobiography to humorously describe “the Embarrassment given them by their Principle against War” (188).

He shows the Quakers as opposed to the war in principle, but secretively supporting it. Franklin describes a situation that arose in his fire company in which the group was supposed to vote on a matter that would benefit the war effort. Although Quakers were a clear majority in the group – 22 of the 30 members were Quaker – only one showed up to oppose the measure. Of the other 21, 13 showed that they did not oppose the measure by not showing up, and 8 hid themselves in a nearby bar, saying they were in favor of the measure but would only publicly support it if it was absolutely necessary. Through this incident, Franklin uses his characteristic dry sense of humor to conclude that most Quakers were not opposed to other people going to war to defend them, as long as they could pretend to not be involved to save their appearance of principle. Another anecdote that Franklin relates shows the Quakers’ willingness to pay for items of war whenever the government wants them to. The government of New England needed money to buy gun powder, and the Quakers said they could not give money for that purpose because gun powder was an instrument of war. However, they gave a large sum of money to the governor with the stipulation that it be used “for the Purchasing of Bread, Flour, Wheat, or other grain” (189). The governor interprets “other grain” to be gunpowder and proceeds to use all the money given to him by the Quakers to buy the needed gunpowder, and the Quaker donors did not oppose this action at all, because they could still pretend to themselves and other people that they had only funded the purchase of food.

In contrast to the Quakers, who stick doggedly to their principles of nonviolence even while tacitly approving the necessity of it, Franklin later relates a story about the Moravians. They were one of the groups exempted from military service because of their pacifist beliefs, so Franklin is surprised to find the Moravian city of Bethlehem mobilized to fight after another Moravian town is destroyed by the French and Indian forces. When he asks the bishop of Bethlehem about this, he replies that they had thought it was one of their principles, but when the danger of the war came to their doorstep they discovered that few of their people actually believed in it anymore. “Common Sense aided by present Danger, will sometimes be too strong for whimsicall Opinions,” Franklin concludes (232).

Franklin, with his strong belief in utility, clearly thinks that the Quakers beliefs are very impractical in times of war, and thus portrays the ridiculous antics they have to go through in order to seem to stick to their principles while actually supporting the war. While Franklin also portrays the Moravians in a satirical way, it is clear that he approves of their adoption of self-defense in the face of danger.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

The Hectic Life of Franklin's Autobiography




The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin begins its first of four parts as a letter to Franklin’s son, William. Franklin begins by saying that he thinks it would be “agreeable to [his son] to know the Circumstances of my (Franklin’s) life, many of which [William] is yet unacquainted with” (Franklin, 43). However, Franklin soon makes it clear in the book that his only concern in writing is not the good of his son. He also states, “The conducing means I made use of, which, with the Blessing of God, so well succeeded, my posterity may like to know…and therefore fit to be imitated.” Franklin here lays out as his two motives for writing: that he wants his son to know him better, and that he believes his life may be worthy of imitation by those trying to succeed in the way he has.

The manner in which Franklin went about writing the four parts of this autobiography may be illuminating for exploring the context of the work. He began in December 1771 during a visit to his friend, Bishop Jonathan Shipley’s, home in Southern England (benjaminfranklinhouse.org). He finished Part I possibly during this visit or soon after. Thirteen years pass before Franklin begins writing Part II (Labaree et al. 22). Much has changed in his life since this last section, some of which affects the work itself. Franklin has a falling out with his son William over loyalties in the American Revolution in the time between Part I and Part II, so the Autobiography no longer operates under the pretense of a letter to his son after Part I. This may also account for a shift in tone between Part I and the later parts of the work from a more personal account to a more external account. Franklin’s increasing political responsibilities in Philadelphia keep him from writing Part III for many years until around 1788 when he describes his life up until his arrival in England in 1757 (Labaree et al. 24). Franklin is believed to have written the final section in the winter of 1789-1790 before his death in April 1790. If so, then the brevity of the final section may be a result of loss of hand control due to old age (Labaree et al. 25).

The publication history of Franklin’s autobiography represents a process that is as fragmented as Franklin’s writing of the text and as dramatic as Franklin’s stories in the text. Before Franklin died he sent copies of his work to Benjamin Vaughan in England to show to Dr. Richard Price (Labaree et al. 24). In a letter from Dr. Price, Vaughan is described as a “West India merchant” whose English family has ties to Philadelphia society (Price, 241). Franklin also sent a copy of his manuscript to Louis Guillaume Le Veillard, mayor of Passy, an area of Paris, in which Franklin once operated a printing press (Labaree et al. 26; europeupclose.com).

After his death, Franklin willed all of his writings to his grandson William Temple Franklin, including his autobiographical manuscripts (Labaree et al. 26). William Temple was the son of Franklin’s illegitimate son, William, with whom Franklin had previously fallen out of touch (Labaree et al. 26). William Temple had accompanied Benjamin Franklin on diplomatic trips to France during his lifetime. Upon his grandfather’s death, William wrote to Veillard (and probably Vaughan) that they were not to publish Franklin’s autobiography, but were instead to send him any of the papers they still had pertaining to those manuscripts (Labaree et al. 26). However, in 1791 a French publisher named Jacques Buisson thwarted William’s plans by publishing a French edition of Part I of the Autobiography under the title “Memoires de la vie privee de Benjamin Franklin, ecrits par lui-meme, et addresses a son fils, suivis d’un précis historique de sa vie politique, et de plusieurs pieces, relatives a ce pere de la liberte,” translated: ‘Memoires of the private life of Benjamin Franklin, written by himself, and addressed to his son, following a precise history of his political life, and several parts, of this father of freedom” (librarycompany.org).

Buisson had a publishing house in Paris in the late 18th century that, besides Franklin’s Autobiography, published works like Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, Diderot’s La Religieuse, and John Adams’ A Defense of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America (openlibrary.org). In the original preface of this work, Buisson notes that he will not state specifically how he came into possession of the manuscript of Franklin’s Autobiography but William Franklin’s suspicions were on Le Veillard. However, Veillard quickly denied any involvement and there is little evidence to suggest any particular source as Buisson’s supplier (Labaree et al. 27). However, no other copies were known of in Europe besides those sent by Franklin to Le Veillard and Vaughan, so it seems likely that one of these two copies somehow ended up in the hands of Buisson. Buisson originally suggested that if he could get 400 subscribers for the Autobiography, he would re-print the edition in English. However, that promise (or threat) was never carried out (Labaree et al. 28).

After the French edition of Part I had come out, William Temple focused his attention on trying to prevent an English translation from coming out before William had the opportunity to publish it himself. He had only his grandfather’s original manuscript, which he realized would be hard to print because of its messy notes and haphazard format. Therefore, William traveled to Paris and traded his original manuscript for Le Veillard’s copy, not realizing that his original manuscript was the only one complete with Part IV (Labaree et al. 28).

However, in 1793, William’s illusions that he had thwarted an English translation of the French edition ceased when two editions came out. One was published by J. Parsons in London and was a very literal translation of the French (Labaree et al. 28). The other translation of the French came out in installments in The Lady’s Magazine or Entertaining Companion of the Fair Sex, which was a British magazine sold from 1770 until 1837, costing six pence per issue (regencyfashion.org).

The same publishers of this British Fashion Magazine also published the two-volume work, Works of the Late Doctor Benjamin Franklin: Consisting of His Life Written by Himself, together with Essays, Humorous, Moral &Literary, Chiefly in the Manner of the Spectator (Labaree et al. 29). A translation of Franklin’s autobiography made up the first 94 pages of this book, followed by excerpts from Franklin’s will, letters Franklin had written, and various essays, including “On Modern Innovations in the English Language and in Printing” and “On the Art of Swimming” (archive.org). Benjamin Vaughan largely took responsibility for the publication of this text (Labaree et al. 29). Because we know that the autobiographical section of the work is a translation of the French, we can assume that Vaughan had by this point lost the copy that Benjamin Franklin had originally sent to him. Responding to William Temple Franklin’s probable anger over the publication of this work, the Preface states, “There can be no sufficient reason, that what has thus been submitted to the perusal of Europe, should not be made accessible to those whom Dr. Franklin’s language is native” (Labaree et al. 29). Over the next several decades this work was translated into Danish, Dutch, French, German, Polish, and Spanish across the world and became the primary source for the works of Benjamin Franklin during the era, while William Temple Franklin inexplicably sat on his manuscript without publishing it (Labaree et al. 30).

Finally in 1817-1818, William began publishing the full text that he possessed, although still not realizing that he did not have the text in its entirety that he had traded to Le Veillard (Labaree et al. 31). Along with texts containing Franklin’s Private Correspondence and political writings, Temple published all the parts of the Autobiography that he had in a five-part volume. This edition of the text was considered the complete edition until the real edition became available in 1867 and people began to notice multiple discrepancies (Labaree et al. 31). Today there is much debate over who changed (and why) so many things from the original. Some of the changes may have been a simple result of multiple translations from English to French and back to English, but other changes seem like deliberate efforts to clean up Franklin’s writing (Labaree et al. 33).

Louis Le Veillard, the man to whom William Temple Franklin had sold the original text, began carefully translating the original and seemed to want to publish it, but he was executed during the Reign of Terror before he got the chance (Labaree et al. 34). After the original manuscript had floated around Europe for several decades, the Library of Congress bought it from a bookseller in Europe in 1908. In the meantime, an American minister named John Bigelow had owned the original manuscript along with Franklin’s original outline, and in 1868 Bigelow published the first edition of the work to be actually based on the original manuscript (Labaree et al. 35). However, there were still a few errors that were fixed in the 1940’s edition.

The chaotic story of the writing and publishing of this work demonstrates how much interest there was in keeping the autobiography of Benjamin Franklin alive. Like the strange and rapidly changing life of the man who wrote this work, the production of it for posterity was similarly hectic, but with a fruitful result. Today, the work has become one of the most influential pieces of autobiography in history, giving us a glimpse into the mind and life of a man who had so much influence on our nation, our knowledge, and our beliefs.

Works Cited:

Franklin, Benjamin. The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.

Labaree, Leonard W. et al. Introduction. The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. By Benjamin Franklin. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.

"The Franklin Trail." Benjamin Franklin House. Benjamin Franklin House, n.d. Web. 10 Dec 2011. .

Price, Richard. The Correspondence of Richard Price. 3. Duke University Press, 1994. eBook. .

Bouchard, Jen. "Paris's 16th Arrondissement." Europe Up Close. Europe Up Close, n.d. Web. 10 Dec 2011. .

"Benjamin Franklin: Writer and Printer." Library Company. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Dec 2011. .

"Publisher: Chez Buisson." Open Library. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Dec 2011. .

"The Lad'ys Magazine." Regency Fashion. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Dec 2011. .

"The Works of the Late Doctor Benjamin Franklin." Internet Archive. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Dec 2011. .

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Carpe Diem

While reading Ben Franklin's autobiography, a couple of quotes stood out to me. The first came from one of Benjamin Vaughan's letters to Franklin:
Another thing demonstrated will be the propriety of every man's waiting for his time for appearing upon the stage of the world. Our sensations being very much fixed to the moment, we are apt to forget that more moments are to follow the first, and consequently that man should arrange his conduct so as to suit the whole of a life. (137)

Another quote, which came after Franklin ran into a poor woman who swept dust away in hope of getting some form of reimbursement, spoke similarly to me:

Human Felicity is produc'd not so much by great Pieces of good Fortune that seldom happen, as by little Advantages that occur ever Day. Thus if you teach a young Man to shave himself and keep his Razor in order, you may contribute more to the Happiness of his Life than in giving him a 1000 Guineas. (207)

What got me about these quotes is their pertinence today. More and more today it seems like we are geared to getting the next quick fix, of satisfying ourselves as quickly as we possibly can or trying to find a shortcut to make it big in life. However, as Vaughan says to Franklin, we should be trying to take small steps as we move forward in life, not placing any one moment above the other. That is not to say that we shouldn't try to seize the opportunities that present themselves to us. Whether it is in school, work, or any other part of life, there is no sense in letting an opportunity pass by you. However, it is equally as important not to put so much stake in any particular moment or focus on merely short-term benefits. It is important to realize that for many of us, barring some tragic disaster, life is generally long. It is important to build for that kind of life, rather than get caught up in any one moment. The second quote, Franklin's own words, are similar to me. Our happiness, while it can come from single extraordinary moments, is built everyday in much smaller moments.
The only thing that bothered me was that this came from Ben Franklin. While it is no doubt that Franklin is a true self-made man and that many of the moments in his autobiography are seemingly small moments which Franklin uses to make his points, Franklin's life had some very amazing moments as well. However, I still find a great deal of validity in what is found in Franklin's autobiography. Fantastic moments do give us some excitement, but I believe true happiness is found when we take the time to cherish the small moments, and live our full life rather than get wrapped up in any one moment.